Norrkoping

1. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   16 PTS
2. BM
   B. Middlebrooks —
   13.8 PTS
3. PH
   P. Hampton —
   13 PTS
4. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   12 PTS
5. ND
   N. Dawit —
   11.9 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   8.5 REB
2. BM
   B. Middlebrooks —
   6.7 REB
3. RC
   R. Cisarik —
   5.3 REB
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   4.4 REB
5. SF
   S. Forsling —
   3.9 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   4.2 AST
2. HB
   H. Bergstrom —
   3.6 AST
3. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   2.5 AST
4. ND
   N. Dawit —
   1.9 AST
5. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ND
   N. Dawit —
   2.8 3PM
2. DJ
   D. Johnson —
   2.2 3PM
3. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   1.6 3PM
4. BM
   B. Middlebrooks —
   1.6 3PM
5. HB
   H. Bergstrom —
   1.3 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   27.4 MIN
2. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   26.4 MIN
3. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   25 MIN
4. BM
   B. Middlebrooks —
   24.6 MIN
5. HB
   H. Bergstrom —
   23.8 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   S. Forsling —
   68.4 %
2. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   51.3 %
3. PH
   P. Hampton —
   51.2 %
4. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   50.8 %
5. BM
   B. Middlebrooks —
   48.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DJ
   D. Johnson —
   39.2 %
2. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   37.9 %
3. BM
   B. Middlebrooks —
   37.8 %
4. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   37.8 %
5. ND
   N. Dawit —
   37.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   84.4 %
2. ND
   N. Dawit —
   83.3 %
3. HB
   H. Bergstrom —
   81.9 %
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   81 %
5. RC
   R. Cisarik —
   76.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   12 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   8.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   1.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   27.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   50.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   35.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GL
   Griffin LaDarien 前锋
   62.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   16.6 PTS
2. SH
   S. Hunter —
   14.3 PTS
3. DG
   D. Green —
   13.7 PTS
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   11.9 PTS
5. ND
   N. Dawit —
   10.4 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SH
   S. Hunter —
   9 REB
2. CK
   C. Keenon —
   4 REB
3. PH
   P. Hampton —
   4 REB
4. SF
   S. Forsling —
   3.8 REB
5. DG
   D. Green —
   3.6 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   4.9 AST
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3 AST
3. DG
   D. Green —
   2.3 AST
4. SH
   S. Hunter —
   1.9 AST
5. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2.8 3PM
2. ND
   N. Dawit —
   2.2 3PM
3. DG
   D. Green —
   2 3PM
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   1.1 3PM
5. CK
   C. Keenon —
   1.1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SH
   S. Hunter —
   27.5 MIN
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   25.1 MIN
3. DG
   D. Green —
   25 MIN
4. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   24.3 MIN
5. ND
   N. Dawit —
   24.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SH
   S. Hunter —
   64.1 %
2. SF
   S. Forsling —
   57.3 %
3. PH
   P. Hampton —
   51.9 %
4. CK
   C. Keenon —
   48.4 %
5. MT
   M. Tyus —
   45.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   40.2 %
2. PH
   P. Hampton —
   40.2 %
3. TJ
   T. Jonsson —
   37 %
4. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   36.4 %
5. CK
   C. Keenon —
   36.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   88.1 %
2. PH
   P. Hampton —
   86 %
3. ND
   N. Dawit —
   83 %
4. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   81 %
5. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   80 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   6.6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   2.1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   0.8 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   17.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   44.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   36.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   81 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   14.1 PTS
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   13.1 PTS
3. FT
   F. Terins —
   12.5 PTS
4. IV
   I. Vann —
   11.9 PTS
5. CP
   C. Penha —
   11.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   8 REB
2. KG
   K. Gamble —
   6.1 REB
3. CP
   C. Penha —
   4.2 REB
4. IV
   I. Vann —
   4.2 REB
5. ED
   E. Desport —
   3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   5.6 AST
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   3.5 AST
3. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2.6 AST
4. HB
   H. Bergstrom —
   2.5 AST
5. IV
   I. Vann —
   2.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2.2 3PM
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   2.2 3PM
3. ND
   N. Dawit —
   1.7 3PM
4. CP
   C. Penha —
   1.6 3PM
5. IV
   I. Vann —
   0.9 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   25.3 MIN
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   25.1 MIN
3. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   23.6 MIN
4. IV
   I. Vann —
   22.8 MIN
5. KG
   K. Gamble —
   21.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   64.4 %
2. KG
   K. Gamble —
   55.4 %
3. IV
   I. Vann —
   53.5 %
4. CP
   C. Penha —
   51.8 %
5. MT
   M. Tyus —
   47.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CP
   C. Penha —
   40.9 %
2. ND
   N. Dawit —
   40 %
3. MT
   M. Tyus —
   39.1 %
4. FT
   F. Terins —
   37.1 %
5. IV
   I. Vann —
   34.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ND
   N. Dawit —
   93.5 %
2. IV
   I. Vann —
   91.1 %
3. KG
   K. Gamble —
   82.4 %
4. FT
   F. Terins —
   79.2 %
5. CP
   C. Penha —
   76.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DG
   D. Green —
   16.3 PTS
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   15.5 PTS
3. SH
   S. Hunter —
   13.3 PTS
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   10.3 PTS
5. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   6.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SH
   S. Hunter —
   6 REB
2. CK
   C. Keenon —
   5.2 REB
3. DG
   D. Green —
   4.2 REB
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   3.8 REB
5. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3.2 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   5.7 AST
2. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   3.5 AST
3. DG
   D. Green —
   2.5 AST
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2.2 AST
5. PH
   P. Hampton —
   1.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2.8 3PM
2. DG
   D. Green —
   2.7 3PM
3. PH
   P. Hampton —
   1.5 3PM
4. ND
   N. Dawit —
   1 3PM
5. CK
   C. Keenon —
   0.7 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DG
   D. Green —
   31 MIN
2. SH
   S. Hunter —
   27.5 MIN
3. PH
   P. Hampton —
   26 MIN
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   25.5 MIN
5. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   25 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SH
   S. Hunter —
   63.5 %
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   52.3 %
3. SF
   S. Forsling —
   44.4 %
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   44 %
5. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   42.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   45.9 %
2. PH
   P. Hampton —
   42.9 %
3. DG
   D. Green —
   41 %
4. CK
   C. Keenon —
   28.6 %
5. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   28.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ND
   N. Dawit —
   100 %
2. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   87.5 %
3. CK
   C. Keenon —
   76.9 %
4. PH
   P. Hampton —
   75 %
5. SH
   S. Hunter —
   73.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   6.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   2.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   3.5 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   0.7 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   17.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   42.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   28.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   66.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CP
   C. Penha —
   11.5 PTS
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   11.3 PTS
3. IV
   I. Vann —
   11.2 PTS
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   11 PTS
5. KG
   K. Gamble —
   9.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   8.8 REB
2. KG
   K. Gamble —
   5.3 REB
3. CP
   C. Penha —
   5 REB
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   4.5 REB
5. IV
   I. Vann —
   3.7 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   3.8 AST
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3.5 AST
3. FT
   F. Terins —
   2.7 AST
4. HB
   H. Bergstrom —
   2.5 AST
5. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FT
   F. Terins —
   2.2 3PM
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2 3PM
3. CP
   C. Penha —
   1.7 3PM
4. ND
   N. Dawit —
   1.5 3PM
5. KG
   K. Gamble —
   1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   28.8 MIN
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   27.2 MIN
3. MT
   M. Tyus —
   26.2 MIN
4. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   24.1 MIN
5. KG
   K. Gamble —
   23.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CP
   C. Penha —
   57.1 %
2. ED
   E. Desport —
   50 %
3. KG
   K. Gamble —
   46.9 %
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   45 %
5. IV
   I. Vann —
   42.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KG
   K. Gamble —
   46.2 %
2. CP
   C. Penha —
   43.5 %
3. FT
   F. Terins —
   35.1 %
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   33.3 %
5. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   30 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ND
   N. Dawit —
   100 %
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   86.7 %
3. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   81.8 %
4. IV
   I. Vann —
   77.8 %
5. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   66.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   22 PTS
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   15 PTS
3. SH
   S. Hunter —
   14 PTS
4. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   13 PTS
5. CO
   C. Offurum —
   11 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SH
   S. Hunter —
   11 REB
2. CO
   C. Offurum —
   8 REB
3. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   7 REB
4. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   6 REB
5. PC
   P. Carr —
   6 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   6 AST
2. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   5 AST
3. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   4 AST
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3 AST
5. CO
   C. Offurum —
   2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3 3PM
2. ND
   N. Dawit —
   3 3PM
3. CK
   C. Keenon —
   2 3PM
4. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   2 3PM
5. AW
   A. Williams —
   1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   33.7 MIN
2. SH
   S. Hunter —
   33.3 MIN
3. MT
   M. Tyus —
   31 MIN
4. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   29.2 MIN
5. DG
   D. Green —
   27.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   250 %
2. SH
   S. Hunter —
   100 %
3. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   90.9 %
4. CK
   C. Keenon —
   66.7 %
5. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   66.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   100 %
2. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   100 %
3. ND
   N. Dawit —
   75 %
4. CK
   C. Keenon —
   66.7 %
5. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   50 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   100 %
2. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   100 %
3. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   75 %
4. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   75 %
5. DG
   D. Green —
   71.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   13 PTS
2. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   10 PTS
3. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   5 PTS
4. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   6 REB
2. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   5 REB
3. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   2 REB
4. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   5 AST
2. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   4 AST
3. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   2 AST
4. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   1 3PM
2. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   1 3PM
3. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   0 3PM
4. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   33.7 MIN
2. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   20.7 MIN
3. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   17.9 MIN
4. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   11.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   250 %
2. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   66.7 %
3. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   50 %
4. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LD
   Love Daniel 后卫
   50 %
2. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   33.3 %
3. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   0 %
4. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KJ
   Kazadi Jonathan 后卫
   100 %
2. KR
   Kovac Roberto 后卫
   100 %
3. NE
   Nottage Eric 后卫
   75 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   22 PTS
2. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   7 PTS
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   4 PTS
4. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   7 REB
2. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   4 REB
3. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   3 REB
4. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   1 AST
2. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   1 AST
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0 AST
4. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   2 3PM
2. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   1 3PM
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0 3PM
4. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   29.2 MIN
2. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   20.4 MIN
3. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   16.3 MIN
4. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   14.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   90.9 %
2. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   42.9 %
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   40 %
4. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JN
   Jurkovitz Natan 前锋
   100 %
2. CA
   Cotture Arnaud 前锋
   50 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SC
   Sane Cheikh 前锋
   75 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   15 PTS
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   14.3 PTS
3. IV
   I. Vann —
   10.7 PTS
4. ND
   N. Dawit —
   10.7 PTS
5. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   10.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CP
   C. Penha —
   8 REB
2. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   6 REB
3. FT
   F. Terins —
   3.7 REB
4. KG
   K. Gamble —
   3.7 REB
5. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3.7 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FT
   F. Terins —
   6 AST
2. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   6 AST
3. MT
   M. Tyus —
   2.7 AST
4. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   1.7 AST
5. CP
   C. Penha —
   1.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   3 3PM
2. ND
   N. Dawit —
   2.3 3PM
3. FT
   F. Terins —
   2 3PM
4. CP
   C. Penha —
   1.3 3PM
5. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   28.3 MIN
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   27.3 MIN
3. TS
   T. Schuberg —
   26.2 MIN
4. MT
   M. Tyus —
   25.9 MIN
5. CP
   C. Penha —
   24.5 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ND
   N. Dawit —
   57.1 %
2. IV
   I. Vann —
   56 %
3. MT
   M. Tyus —
   53.6 %
4. FT
   F. Terins —
   50 %
5. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   47.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. IV
   I. Vann —
   60 %
2. MT
   M. Tyus —
   52.9 %
3. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   50 %
4. ND
   N. Dawit —
   43.8 %
5. FT
   F. Terins —
   35.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MT
   M. Tyus —
   100 %
2. FT
   F. Terins —
   75 %
3. AR
   A. Ramstedt —
   66.7 %
4. CP
   C. Penha —
   25 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.