Donar Groningen

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   21.4 PTS
2. MM
   M. Miller —
   17.4 PTS
3. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   16.2 PTS
4. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   7.6 PTS
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   6.6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Miller —
   8.8 REB
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   6.2 REB
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   4.8 REB
4. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   4.4 REB
5. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   3.6 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   8.4 AST
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   2.6 AST
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   2.6 AST
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2.2 AST
5. MM
   M. Miller —
   2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   5.2 3PM
2. MM
   M. Miller —
   2 3PM
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 3PM
4. ET
   E. Taylor —
   1 3PM
5. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0.8 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   36.2 MIN
2. MM
   M. Miller —
   32.5 MIN
3. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   31 MIN
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   26.6 MIN
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   24.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ET
   E. Taylor —
   100 %
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   64.7 %
3. MM
   M. Miller —
   59.2 %
4. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   48.4 %
5. WN
   W. Nossek —
   42.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ET
   E. Taylor —
   100 %
2. MM
   M. Miller —
   52.6 %
3. CL
   C. Linguard Jr —
   42.9 %
4. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   37.7 %
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   100 %
2. CL
   C. Linguard Jr —
   83.3 %
3. MM
   M. Miller —
   67.9 %
4. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   50 %
5. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   50 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   21.4 PTS
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   6.6 PTS
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   4.4 REB
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 REB
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   8.4 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   2.6 AST
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   5.2 3PM
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 3PM
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   36.2 MIN
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   24.7 MIN
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   42 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   32.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   37.7 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   100 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   16.2 PTS
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   7.6 PTS
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   6.2 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   4.8 REB
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   3.6 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   2.6 AST
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2.2 AST
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0.8 3PM
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   0.2 3PM
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   31 MIN
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   26.6 MIN
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   22 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   64.7 %
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   48.4 %
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   39.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   23.5 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   6.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   50 %
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   50 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   21.4 PTS
2. JK
   J. Karnik —
   13.2 PTS
3. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   10.8 PTS
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   9.8 PTS
5. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   6.8 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JK
   J. Karnik —
   10 REB
2. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   5 REB
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.8 REB
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   4.2 REB
5. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   4 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   4.2 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   3.6 AST
3. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   2.2 AST
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2 AST
5. JK
   J. Karnik —
   1.4 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   4 3PM
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 3PM
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.4 3PM
4. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   1.2 3PM
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   30.9 MIN
2. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   29.4 MIN
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   28.4 MIN
4. JK
   J. Karnik —
   27.9 MIN
5. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   24 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JK
   J. Karnik —
   52.5 %
2. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   44.6 %
3. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   42.6 %
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   35.6 %
5. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   35.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   40 %
2. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   37 %
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   33.3 %
4. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   31.6 %
5. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   26.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   100 %
2. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   100 %
3. JK
   J. Karnik —
   85.2 %
4. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   80 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   5.8 PTS
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.2 PTS
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 PTS
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.8 REB
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   2 REB
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 REB
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   3.6 AST
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   1.4 AST
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 AST
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 3PM
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0.4 3PM
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 3PM
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   28.4 MIN
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   15.2 MIN
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1.9 MIN
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   1.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   31 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   30.3 %
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   33.3 %
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   14.3 %
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   9.8 PTS
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   6.8 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   4.2 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.8 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2 AST
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   0.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.4 3PM
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   24 MIN
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   23.3 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   35.6 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   35.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   26.9 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   22.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   100 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   10.8 PTS
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   2.6 PTS
3. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.4 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   5 REB
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   3 REB
3. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.4 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   2.2 AST
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0.8 AST
3. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   1.2 3PM
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0.4 3PM
3. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   30.9 MIN
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   9.4 MIN
3. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   2.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   42.6 %
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   27.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   40 %
2. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   31.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   80 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   21.8 PTS
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   16.3 PTS
3. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   15 PTS
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   14.1 PTS
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   11.9 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   7.3 REB
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   6.5 REB
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   5.6 REB
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   4.9 REB
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.2 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   7.4 AST
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.4 AST
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   2.2 AST
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2.1 AST
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   2.8 3PM
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   2.6 3PM
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   2 3PM
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.8 3PM
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   32.4 MIN
2. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   32.2 MIN
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   31.8 MIN
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   27 MIN
5. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   25.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   80 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   58.9 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   58.6 %
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   48.2 %
5. DA
   D. Adetunji —
   44.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   56 %
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   55 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   48.5 %
4. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   33.3 %
5. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   32.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   100 %
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   75 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   73.9 %
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   68.4 %
5. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   61.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   15 PTS
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4 PTS
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.2 REB
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   4.1 REB
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   7.4 AST
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.4 AST
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   2.6 3PM
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0.4 3PM
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   32.4 MIN
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   22.3 MIN
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   5.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   44.4 %
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   38.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   33.3 %
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   32.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   75 %
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   55.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   21.8 PTS
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   14.1 PTS
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   11.9 PTS
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   11.4 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   6.5 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   5.6 REB
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   4.9 REB
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   2.8 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   2.2 AST
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2.1 AST
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.8 AST
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   0.9 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   2.8 3PM
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   2 3PM
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.8 3PM
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   32.2 MIN
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   31.8 MIN
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   27 MIN
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   25.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   58.9 %
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   58.6 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   48.2 %
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   43 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   56 %
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   55 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   48.5 %
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   18.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   100 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   73.9 %
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   68.4 %
4. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   61.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   16.3 PTS
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   7.3 REB
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   1.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   1.5 AST
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0.3 3PM
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   25.7 MIN
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   8.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   80 %
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   40 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   61.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   C. Mounce —
   15.8 PTS
2. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   12.9 PTS
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   8.9 PTS
4. VT
   V. Taylor —
   8.7 PTS
5. WB
   W. Brandwijk —
   6.6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   C. Mounce —
   6 REB
2. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   5.8 REB
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   5.6 REB
4. WB
   W. Brandwijk —
   4.6 REB
5. PO
   P. Olisemeka —
   4.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   3 AST
2. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   2.7 AST
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   2.4 AST
4. VT
   V. Taylor —
   1.8 AST
5. LW
   L. Williams —
   1.7 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   C. Mounce —
   1.1 3PM
2. VT
   V. Taylor —
   1 3PM
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   0.9 3PM
4. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   0.8 3PM
5. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   0.6 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   31.2 MIN
2. CM
   C. Mounce —
   27.6 MIN
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   25.6 MIN
4. WB
   W. Brandwijk —
   24.6 MIN
5. VT
   V. Taylor —
   22.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. PO
   P. Olisemeka —
   60.5 %
2. CM
   C. Mounce —
   53 %
3. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   48.6 %
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   42.9 %
5. VT
   V. Taylor —
   42.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VT
   V. Taylor —
   45.5 %
2. CM
   C. Mounce —
   37.9 %
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   34.6 %
4. LW
   L. Williams —
   29.4 %
5. VG
   V. Gaddefors —
   22.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VT
   V. Taylor —
   81.2 %
2. WB
   W. Brandwijk —
   80 %
3. SB
   S. Branch —
   78.8 %
4. CM
   C. Mounce —
   71.4 %
5. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   70 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   2.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   2.7 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   0.6 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   20.5 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   28.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   15.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MA
   Magdevski Andrej 后卫
   70 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.8 PTS
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   0.3 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   0.6 AST
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   0.4 3PM
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   7.4 MIN
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.3 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   42.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   19.9 PTS
2. TE
   T. Evan —
   19 PTS
3. ET
   E. Taylor —
   13.8 PTS
4. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   13.4 PTS
5. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   10.8 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   6.4 REB
2. MM
   M. Miller —
   5.3 REB
3. ET
   E. Taylor —
   5.1 REB
4. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   4.3 REB
5. CL
   C. Linguard Jr —
   4.2 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   9.1 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   3.4 AST
3. TE
   T. Evan —
   3 AST
4. MM
   M. Miller —
   2.8 AST
5. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TE
   T. Evan —
   5 3PM
2. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   2.6 3PM
3. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   2.6 3PM
4. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.9 3PM
5. CL
   C. Linguard Jr —
   1.4 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TE
   T. Evan —
   30.6 MIN
2. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   29.9 MIN
3. ET
   E. Taylor —
   27.9 MIN
4. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   27.8 MIN
5. MM
   M. Miller —
   26.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   66.7 %
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   65.2 %
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   57.1 %
4. ET
   E. Taylor —
   56.3 %
5. TE
   T. Evan —
   53.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TE
   T. Evan —
   62.5 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   52.8 %
3. ET
   E. Taylor —
   41.7 %
4. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   41.1 %
5. CL
   C. Linguard Jr —
   39.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   90.9 %
2. CL
   C. Linguard Jr —
   86.7 %
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   75 %
4. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   74.1 %
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   72.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   13.4 PTS
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   7.7 PTS
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1.7 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   4 REB
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   2.2 REB
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   9.1 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   3.4 AST
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   2.6 3PM
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.9 3PM
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.3 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   29.9 MIN
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   20.5 MIN
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   4.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   66.7 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   47.2 %
3. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   42.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   52.8 %
2. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   36.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   74.1 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   72.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   10.8 PTS
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   5.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   4.3 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2.2 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1 AST
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   0.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   0.1 3PM
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   23.6 MIN
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   20.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   65.2 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   57.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   75 %
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   51.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   20 PTS
2. JK
   J. Karnik —
   19.4 PTS
3. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   17.5 PTS
4. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   16.3 PTS
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   12.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JK
   J. Karnik —
   14.1 REB
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   5.2 REB
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.2 REB
4. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   4 REB
5. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   3.9 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   5 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   4 AST
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   3.3 AST
4. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.3 AST
5. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   2.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   3.5 3PM
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.7 3PM
3. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   2 3PM
4. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.9 3PM
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.5 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   33.9 MIN
2. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   31.2 MIN
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   27.4 MIN
4. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   27.1 MIN
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   26.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   57.9 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   55.9 %
3. JK
   J. Karnik —
   54.5 %
4. DA
   D. Adetunji —
   46.2 %
5. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   43.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   53.3 %
2. JK
   J. Karnik —
   50 %
3. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   38.9 %
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   37.5 %
5. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   36.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   100 %
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   87.5 %
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   85.7 %
4. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   85 %
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   71.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   16.3 PTS
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   7.1 PTS
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.3 PTS
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   1.6 PTS
5. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.2 REB
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   3.7 REB
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   2.2 REB
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   1 REB
5. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.7 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   4 AST
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   3.3 AST
3. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.3 AST
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.4 AST
5. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.7 3PM
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.9 3PM
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.3 3PM
4. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0.2 3PM
5. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   33.9 MIN
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   26.9 MIN
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   23.8 MIN
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   11.9 MIN
5. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   7.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   40.5 %
2. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   40 %
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   38.2 %
4. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   33.3 %
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   53.3 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   35.7 %
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   33.3 %
4. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   14.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   87.5 %
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   43.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   12.2 PTS
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   6.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   5.2 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.7 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2.1 AST
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.5 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.5 3PM
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0.9 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   27.4 MIN
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   23.5 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   55.9 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   38.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   37.5 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   27.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   85.7 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   71.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   9 PTS
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   4.1 PTS
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   4 REB
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   3.9 REB
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   1.6 AST
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.1 AST
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   0.6 3PM
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.1 3PM
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   23.6 MIN
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   10.9 MIN
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   5.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   57.9 %
2. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   39.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   20.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   85 %
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   55.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   18.4 PTS
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   13.5 PTS
3. TE
   T. Evan —
   13 PTS
4. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   12.6 PTS
5. ET
   E. Taylor —
   12.4 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Miller —
   7.5 REB
2. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   6.9 REB
3. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   6.9 REB
4. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   5.7 REB
5. ET
   E. Taylor —
   4.9 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   8.5 AST
2. MM
   M. Miller —
   2.3 AST
3. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   2 AST
4. TE
   T. Evan —
   2 AST
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   2.6 3PM
2. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   2.1 3PM
3. ET
   E. Taylor —
   1.8 3PM
4. TE
   T. Evan —
   1.4 3PM
5. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.3 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   31.1 MIN
2. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   30.1 MIN
3. TE
   T. Evan —
   29.7 MIN
4. MM
   M. Miller —
   27.9 MIN
5. ET
   E. Taylor —
   27.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   62 %
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   57.9 %
3. DA
   D. Adetunji —
   51.9 %
4. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   47.3 %
5. TE
   T. Evan —
   44.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ET
   E. Taylor —
   37.4 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   36.8 %
3. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   35.8 %
4. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   35.7 %
5. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   34.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   87.5 %
2. DE
   D. Erikstrup —
   81.8 %
3. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   81.5 %
4. ET
   E. Taylor —
   80 %
5. TE
   T. Evan —
   77.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   12.6 PTS
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   5.3 PTS
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   4.2 REB
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.7 REB
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   8.5 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.8 AST
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   2.6 3PM
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.3 3PM
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   31.1 MIN
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   19.4 MIN
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   3.8 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   39.6 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   38.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   36.8 %
2. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   35.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LA
   Luke Austin 后卫
   81.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   13.5 PTS
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   9.7 PTS
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   5.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   6.9 REB
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   5.7 REB
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   1.3 AST
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.3 AST
3. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   0.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0.8 3PM
2. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   0.1 3PM
3. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   26 MIN
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   24.7 MIN
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   20.5 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   62 %
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   57.9 %
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   43.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   34.6 %
2. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MK
   Martin Killian 前锋
   87.5 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   62.5 %
3. FD
   Forrest Damian 前锋
   51.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   18.9 PTS
2. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   18.5 PTS
3. JK
   J. Karnik —
   15.7 PTS
4. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   15.4 PTS
5. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   11.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JK
   J. Karnik —
   10.4 REB
2. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   4.6 REB
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   4.1 REB
4. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   3.7 REB
5. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   3.4 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   5.5 AST
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   3.3 AST
3. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.4 AST
4. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   2.4 AST
5. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   2.1 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   3.5 3PM
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.6 3PM
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.9 3PM
4. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   1.8 3PM
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.3 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   32.9 MIN
2. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   31.5 MIN
3. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   30.2 MIN
4. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   29 MIN
5. JK
   J. Karnik —
   27.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JK
   J. Karnik —
   55.3 %
2. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   51.6 %
3. EN
   E. Nanninga —
   50 %
4. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   48.1 %
5. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   47.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. EN
   E. Nanninga —
   50 %
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   45 %
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   39.3 %
4. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   38.6 %
5. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   34.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TD
   T. Dunn-Martin —
   90.6 %
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   90 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   76.9 %
4. ZH
   Z. Harvey —
   73.7 %
5. JK
   J. Karnik —
   72.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   15.4 PTS
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   6.9 PTS
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   4.6 PTS
4. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   1.3 PTS
5. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   3.3 REB
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   3 REB
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   2.3 REB
4. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.6 REB
5. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.6 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   3.3 AST
2. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.4 AST
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   2.4 AST
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.4 AST
5. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   2.6 3PM
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   1.9 3PM
3. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   0.3 3PM
4. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0.2 3PM
5. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   32.9 MIN
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   29 MIN
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   18.4 MIN
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   6.2 MIN
5. GC
   Gelling Coen 后卫
   3.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   45.9 %
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   42.6 %
3. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   39.2 %
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   10.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   45 %
2. HT
   Hoeve Tim 后卫
   39.3 %
3. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   13.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. VK
   Veinot Keevan 后卫
   90 %
2. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   60.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   9.9 PTS
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   5.9 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   4.1 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.2 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.3 AST
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.3 3PM
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0.8 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   24.4 MIN
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   23.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   43.5 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   41.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   31.1 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   31 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   76.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   11.5 PTS
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   3.1 PTS
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0.9 PTS
4. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   4.6 REB
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   3.3 REB
3. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   3 REB
4. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0.4 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   2.1 AST
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.5 AST
3. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0.3 AST
4. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   1.1 3PM
2. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   0.1 3PM
3. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   0.1 3PM
4. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   26.8 MIN
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   11.9 MIN
3. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   10.4 MIN
4. HT
   Heuker Thijs 中锋
   3.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   51.6 %
2. HS
   Hintzbergen Stijn 中锋
   47.1 %
3. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   38.6 %
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BF
   Brankovic Filip 中锋
   71.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   17.5 PTS
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   12.6 PTS
3. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   9.9 PTS
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   9.7 PTS
5. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   8.8 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   6.3 REB
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   6.1 REB
3. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   5.9 REB
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   5 REB
5. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   3.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   5.2 AST
2. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   4 AST
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   2.4 AST
4. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   2.2 AST
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   2.8 3PM
2. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.8 3PM
3. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   1.8 3PM
4. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   1.2 3PM
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   30.7 MIN
2. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   30.5 MIN
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   27.8 MIN
4. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   27.8 MIN
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   26 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   60 %
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   56.3 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   53.5 %
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   48.3 %
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   46.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   43.6 %
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   39.4 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   39.4 %
4. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   35.7 %
5. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   30 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   84.8 %
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   80 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   73.1 %
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   71.7 %
5. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   63.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   12.6 PTS
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   9.9 PTS
3. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   8.8 PTS
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   1.1 PTS
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   3.3 REB
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   2.8 REB
3. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   2.1 REB
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.6 REB
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   5.2 AST
2. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   4 AST
3. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   1.4 AST
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0.3 AST
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   2.8 3PM
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   1.8 3PM
3. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   0.6 3PM
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 3PM
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   30.7 MIN
2. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   30.5 MIN
3. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   24.7 MIN
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   8.4 MIN
5. OS
   Oostrum Sam 后卫
   0 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   41.1 %
2. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   40.2 %
3. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   38.3 %
4. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   35.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   39.4 %
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   35.7 %
3. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   19.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. TN
   Tomsick Nick 后卫
   80 %
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   63.6 %
3. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   62.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   17.5 PTS
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   9.7 PTS
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   8.6 PTS
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   5 PTS
5. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   3.6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   6.3 REB
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   5 REB
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.2 REB
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   2.8 REB
5. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   1.6 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   2.4 AST
2. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   2 AST
3. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2 AST
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.6 AST
5. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   0.7 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.8 3PM
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   1.2 3PM
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1.2 3PM
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0.4 3PM
5. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   0.3 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   27.8 MIN
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   27.8 MIN
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   26 MIN
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   20.7 MIN
5. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   14 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   53.5 %
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   48.3 %
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   46.2 %
4. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   44.4 %
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   34.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   43.6 %
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   39.4 %
3. KJ
   Kuiper Jordy 前锋
   30 %
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   26.3 %
5. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   25.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   84.8 %
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   73.1 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   71.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   8.7 PTS
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   7.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   6.1 REB
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   5.9 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   2.2 AST
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0.8 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   0.1 3PM
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   0.1 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   23.7 MIN
2. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   20 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   60 %
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   56.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   56.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   14 PTS
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   13 PTS
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   11.7 PTS
4. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   11.7 PTS
5. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   7.7 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   10 REB
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   4.7 REB
3. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   4.3 REB
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.7 REB
5. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   3.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   6.7 AST
2. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   4 AST
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   2.7 AST
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.7 AST
5. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   2.3 3PM
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1 3PM
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   1 3PM
4. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   1 3PM
5. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   0.7 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   32.3 MIN
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   31 MIN
3. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   29.3 MIN
4. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   29 MIN
5. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   26.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. QD
   Quinn Dakota Ryan 中锋
   100 %
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   56.7 %
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   54.5 %
4. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   48.4 %
5. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   40 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   46.7 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   33.3 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   33.3 %
4. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   25 %
5. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   16.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   100 %
2. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   100 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   100 %
4. JT
   John Theo 中锋
   70 %
5. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   63.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   7.7 PTS
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   4.3 PTS
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   3.3 REB
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   1.7 REB
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   6.7 AST
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   1 AST
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   1 3PM
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   0.7 3PM
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   29.3 MIN
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   29 MIN
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   3.3 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   28.1 %
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   9.5 %
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RJ
   Ramanauskas Justinas 后卫
   25 %
2. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   16.7 %
3. JL
   Jung Lars 后卫
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. BK
   Babusis Karolis 后卫
   63.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   14 PTS
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   13 PTS
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   11.7 PTS
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   4.7 REB
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   3.7 REB
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   3 REB
4. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   2.7 AST
2. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   1.7 AST
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   1.3 AST
4. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   0.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   2.3 3PM
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   1 3PM
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   1 3PM
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   31 MIN
2. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   26.9 MIN
3. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   20.6 MIN
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   15.3 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   56.7 %
2. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   54.5 %
3. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   48.4 %
4. ZK
   Zuidema Kjeld 前锋
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   46.7 %
2. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   33.3 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. GD
   Gabrovsek David 前锋
   100 %
2. HS
   Hollanders Sander 前锋
   100 %
3. MJ
   Meeks John 前锋
   100 %