Fribourg W

1. KL
   K. Love —
   21.5 PTS
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   21.5 PTS
3. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   12.6 PTS
4. JM
   J. Matic —
   9.7 PTS
5. LW
   L. Wenger —
   6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KL
   K. Love —
   11.3 REB
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   4.2 REB
3. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   3.8 REB
4. JM
   J. Matic —
   3 REB
5. LW
   L. Wenger —
   2.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   6.2 AST
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   3.8 AST
3. KL
   K. Love —
   2.3 AST
4. LW
   L. Wenger —
   1.3 AST
5. JM
   J. Matic —
   1.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NC
   N. Clouden —
   2.5 3PM
2. KL
   K. Love —
   1.7 3PM
3. JM
   J. Matic —
   1.3 3PM
4. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   1.2 3PM
5. LW
   L. Wenger —
   0.7 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NC
   N. Clouden —
   39.8 MIN
2. KL
   K. Love —
   38.7 MIN
3. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   36.5 MIN
4. JM
   J. Matic —
   33 MIN
5. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   23.3 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KL
   K. Love —
   50.5 %
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   50 %
3. LW
   L. Wenger —
   42.9 %
4. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   41.8 %
5. JM
   J. Matic —
   40.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JM
   J. Matic —
   50 %
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   41.7 %
3. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   37.5 %
4. KL
   K. Love —
   34.5 %
5. MD
   M. Dubas —
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. LW
   L. Wenger —
   100 %
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   86.5 %
3. JM
   J. Matic —
   71.4 %
4. KL
   K. Love —
   70 %
5. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   70 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   2.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   2.2 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0.3 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   23.3 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   30.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   70 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   18 PTS
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   11.5 PTS
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   11.2 PTS
4. KS
   K. Shumate —
   10.7 PTS
5. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   10.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KS
   K. Shumate —
   7.5 REB
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   7.3 REB
3. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   4.8 REB
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   4.7 REB
5. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   4.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   3 AST
2. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   2.7 AST
3. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   2.2 AST
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.8 AST
5. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   1.5 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   2.5 3PM
2. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   1.5 3PM
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.3 3PM
4. KS
   K. Shumate —
   1 3PM
5. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   0.8 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   35.4 MIN
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   30.5 MIN
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   29.7 MIN
4. KS
   K. Shumate —
   29.5 MIN
5. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   26.2 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   48 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   44.8 %
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   43.5 %
4. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   43.4 %
5. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   43.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   50 %
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   33.3 %
3. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   33.3 %
4. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   25 %
5. KS
   K. Shumate —
   23.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   90.5 %
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   87.5 %
3. KS
   K. Shumate —
   80 %
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   67.7 %
5. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   66.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   18 PTS
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   11.5 PTS
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   11.2 PTS
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   4 PTS
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   4.7 REB
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   4.5 REB
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   2.3 REB
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   2.2 REB
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   3 AST
2. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   2.7 AST
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.8 AST
4. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   1.5 AST
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   2.5 3PM
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.3 3PM
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   0.3 3PM
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   0.2 3PM
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   30.5 MIN
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   29.7 MIN
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   26.2 MIN
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   21.8 MIN
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   2.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   48 %
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   43.5 %
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   43.4 %
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   33.3 %
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   33.3 %
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   33.3 %
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   20 %
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   7.1 %
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   90.5 %
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   87.5 %
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   67.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   4.3 PTS
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0.8 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   2 REB
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   0.8 AST
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0.6 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   0.8 3PM
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   16.4 MIN
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   12.8 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   31 %
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   16.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   25 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   9.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   7.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   2.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   0.3 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   35.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   44.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   11.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   17.9 PTS
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   16.5 PTS
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   9.6 PTS
4. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   9.2 PTS
5. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   6.6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   7.9 REB
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   6.8 REB
3. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   5.8 REB
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   4.4 REB
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   3.7 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   8 AST
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   3.1 AST
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   2.8 AST
4. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   2.2 AST
5. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   2.6 3PM
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   2.5 3PM
3. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   1.8 3PM
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   0.9 3PM
5. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   0.8 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   37.8 MIN
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   35.3 MIN
3. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   33.7 MIN
4. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   30.8 MIN
5. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   27.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   43.5 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   41.9 %
3. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   39.6 %
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   39.6 %
5. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   39.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   43.8 %
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   37.5 %
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   35.3 %
4. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   31.7 %
5. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   25 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   92.3 %
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   89.5 %
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   84.6 %
4. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   76.2 %
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   76 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   17.9 PTS
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   9.6 PTS
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   6.4 PTS
4. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   6.2 PTS
5. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   5.8 REB
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   4.4 REB
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   3.7 REB
4. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   3.6 REB
5. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   8 AST
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   3.1 AST
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   2.8 AST
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.9 AST
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   2.6 3PM
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   0.9 3PM
3. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   0.6 3PM
4. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0.5 3PM
5. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   0.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   37.8 MIN
2. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   30.8 MIN
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   24.1 MIN
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   23.2 MIN
5. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   5.5 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   43.5 %
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   39.6 %
3. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   36.4 %
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   33.3 %
5. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   31.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   37.5 %
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   35.3 %
3. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   21.4 %
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   0 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   89.5 %
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   84.6 %
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   76 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   6.6 PTS
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0.3 PTS
3. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   2.6 REB
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   1.1 REB
3. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   1 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   0.9 AST
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0.6 AST
3. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   1.8 3PM
2. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0 3PM
3. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   27.9 MIN
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   8.8 MIN
3. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   3.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   39.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   43.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   16.5 PTS
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   9.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   7.9 REB
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   6.8 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   2.2 AST
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   2.5 3PM
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   0.8 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   35.3 MIN
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   33.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   41.9 %
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   39.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   31.7 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   25 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   92.3 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   76.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NC
   N. Clouden —
   23 PTS
2. KL
   K. Love —
   22.4 PTS
3. AR
   A. Recanati —
   18 PTS
4. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   16.3 PTS
5. UD
   U. Drake —
   12.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KL
   K. Love —
   12.5 REB
2. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   6.4 REB
3. JM
   J. Matic —
   6 REB
4. AR
   A. Recanati —
   6 REB
5. LW
   L. Wenger —
   5.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   6.1 AST
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   3.3 AST
3. KL
   K. Love —
   3.3 AST
4. UD
   U. Drake —
   2.5 AST
5. AR
   A. Recanati —
   2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NC
   N. Clouden —
   2.5 3PM
2. UD
   U. Drake —
   1.6 3PM
3. CM
   C. Martinez —
   1.2 3PM
4. KL
   K. Love —
   1.1 3PM
5. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   0.7 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Recanati —
   39.8 MIN
2. NC
   N. Clouden —
   35 MIN
3. KL
   K. Love —
   33.2 MIN
4. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   32.8 MIN
5. JM
   J. Matic —
   30 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Recanati —
   57.1 %
2. KL
   K. Love —
   57.1 %
3. MB
   M. Benjak —
   53.3 %
4. NC
   N. Clouden —
   52.8 %
5. AM
   A. Mitrasinovic —
   51.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. NC
   N. Clouden —
   41.7 %
2. LW
   L. Wenger —
   34.4 %
3. CM
   C. Martinez —
   34.1 %
4. UD
   U. Drake —
   31.6 %
5. KL
   K. Love —
   29.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. AR
   A. Recanati —
   100 %
2. KL
   K. Love —
   86.5 %
3. NC
   N. Clouden —
   85.9 %
4. UD
   U. Drake —
   83.3 %
5. EM
   E. Moix —
   78.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   3.4 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   4.3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   1.1 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   22.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   37.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   71.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   21 PTS
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   16.9 PTS
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   16.4 PTS
4. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   16.3 PTS
5. KS
   K. Shumate —
   16.2 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   11 REB
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   8.5 REB
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   8.1 REB
4. KS
   K. Shumate —
   7.8 REB
5. AC
   A. C. Rodrigues —
   5.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   5.2 AST
2. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   5 AST
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   4.4 AST
4. AC
   A. C. Rodrigues —
   3.5 AST
5. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   3.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   2.4 3PM
2. KS
   K. Shumate —
   2.3 3PM
3. AC
   A. C. Rodrigues —
   2 3PM
4. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   1.9 3PM
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.6 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   31.7 MIN
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   30.1 MIN
3. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   29.6 MIN
4. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   29.1 MIN
5. KS
   K. Shumate —
   27.5 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   66.7 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   61.4 %
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   51.1 %
4. KS
   K. Shumate —
   46.7 %
5. EM
   E. Moix —
   44.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. EM
   E. Moix —
   46.4 %
2. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   42.7 %
3. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   38.3 %
4. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   38.1 %
5. AC
   A. C. Rodrigues —
   36.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. KS
   K. Shumate —
   100 %
2. MM
   M. Mongomo —
   100 %
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   87.9 %
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   84.5 %
5. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   84.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   16.9 PTS
2. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   16.4 PTS
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   13.5 PTS
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   7.4 PTS
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   1.5 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   8.1 REB
2. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   5.4 REB
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   4.8 REB
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   2.8 REB
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0.8 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   5.2 AST
2. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   4.4 AST
3. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   3.2 AST
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   2.8 AST
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0.1 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   2.4 3PM
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   1.6 3PM
3. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   1.4 3PM
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   0.2 3PM
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0.2 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   30.1 MIN
2. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   29.1 MIN
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   26 MIN
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   23.7 MIN
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   5.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   51.1 %
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   43.5 %
3. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   42.9 %
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   41.5 %
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   18.8 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   42.7 %
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   36.1 %
3. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   33.6 %
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   16 %
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   13.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. RD
   Rodriguez Danielle Guard
   87.9 %
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   84.5 %
3. RA
   Rodrogues Ana Carolina Guard
   84.1 %
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   69.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   9 PTS
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   4 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   5 REB
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   4.8 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   1.9 AST
2. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   1.6 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   1.9 3PM
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   25.8 MIN
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   21.9 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   43.3 %
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   37.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   38.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   75.6 %
2. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   55.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   16.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   8.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   2.1 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   0.6 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   29.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   61.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   38.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   84.1 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   18.8 PTS
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   18.2 PTS
3. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   17.6 PTS
4. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   10.7 PTS
5. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   10.1 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   10 REB
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   7.5 REB
3. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   6.4 REB
4. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   5.7 REB
5. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   5.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   8 AST
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   5.6 AST
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   3.7 AST
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   3.4 AST
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   2.9 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   3.4 3PM
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   2.4 3PM
3. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   2 3PM
4. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   1.4 3PM
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   0.9 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   35 MIN
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   29.7 MIN
3. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   29.4 MIN
4. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   28.1 MIN
5. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   28.1 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   60.2 %
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   56.2 %
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   48.9 %
4. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   45.4 %
5. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   43.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   52.5 %
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   36.8 %
3. SJ
   Sollberger Justine Guard
   35.7 %
4. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   34.9 %
5. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   33.3 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   84.2 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   83.3 %
3. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   81.6 %
4. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   76.7 %
5. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   75.4 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   18.8 PTS
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   9.9 PTS
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   9.8 PTS
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   6.5 PTS
5. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   3.3 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   7.5 REB
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   5.7 REB
3. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   5 REB
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   4.7 REB
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   3 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   8 AST
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   5.6 AST
3. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   3.7 AST
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   3.4 AST
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   2.9 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   2.4 3PM
2. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   0.9 3PM
3. SJ
   Sollberger Justine Guard
   0.7 3PM
4. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   0.7 3PM
5. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   0.4 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   35 MIN
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   28.1 MIN
3. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   27 MIN
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   26.1 MIN
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   21.7 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   48.9 %
2. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   45.4 %
3. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   43.7 %
4. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   42.9 %
5. SJ
   Sollberger Justine Guard
   42.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   36.8 %
2. SJ
   Sollberger Justine Guard
   35.7 %
3. CM
   Carpreaux Marjorie Guard
   33.3 %
4. KJ
   Krummenacher Jade Guard
   32 %
5. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   24.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HQ
   Hoppie Qadashah Guard
   84.2 %
2. UC
   Ucalam Cesaria Ambrosio Guard
   75.4 %
3. RV
   Ranisavljevic Viktoria Guard
   72.6 %
4. TN
   Takyi Naomi Guard
   57.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   10.7 PTS
2. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   10.1 PTS
3. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   5 PTS
4. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0.9 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   5.5 REB
2. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   4.9 REB
3. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   4 REB
4. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0.5 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   2.5 AST
2. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   2.2 AST
3. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   1.8 AST
4. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0.2 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   2 3PM
2. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   1.4 3PM
3. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   0.2 3PM
4. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   0 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   28.1 MIN
2. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   22.6 MIN
3. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   20.5 MIN
4. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   4.6 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   40.2 %
2. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   39.6 %
3. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   38.1 %
4. LM
   Losey Mahe Forward
   28.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   34.9 %
2. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   32.9 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. JE
   Jacquot Elea Forward
   81.6 %
2. HD
   Harden Destiny Forward
   76.7 %
3. SF
   Stoianov Flora Forward
   57.7 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   18.2 PTS
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   17.6 PTS

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   10 REB
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   6.4 REB

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   1.8 AST
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   1.6 AST

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   3.4 3PM
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   0.4 3PM

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   29.7 MIN
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   29.4 MIN

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   60.2 %
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   56.2 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   52.5 %
2. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   27.5 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.

1. FA
   Fogg Abigail Center
   83.3 %
2. UM
   Uro-Nile Miriam Center
   63.6 %

Per-game leaders from available box score data.